Tuesday, April 25, 2006

The pageant world hasn't been rocked this hard since Drop Dead Gorgeous

As some of you may or may not know (though I'm guessing that many of you will probably not care either way), I once worked with and also participated in beauty pageants. Specifically, I was the "assistant producer" to both the Miss USA and Miss Teen USA state pageants for an undisclosed southern state, one I might add which I had never even set foot in the state. I was also an entrant in two filipino pageants when I was a teenager despite my disappointing failure to pass for even half-Asian. And I was reminded of my pageant history with the recent crowning of Miss USA last week -- it was in Baltimore. For at least a week leading up to the pageant, there were 51 bonafied beauty queens running around only the classiest of Maryland sites ranging from the Muvico theatre to Ocean City to Baltimore. But they're all gone now, so the overall average attractiveness of the state has returned to its normal subpar levels. Since I missed the chance to pal around with some mascara-addicted, starving women with permanent smiles I figured I'd keep the pageant world alive in the old line state by exposing the dark underbelly of pageantry. So get ready, because this entry will mark the beginning of a two part series in which I reveal all I learned about pageants during my 2 year stint at the pageant production company, hereafter referred to as Sexual Harrassment, Inc.

Dark secret 1) Pageants are really old-fashioned. And not because they objectify women, but because they objectify women in a really weird and dated way. The women who participate in pageants are stuck in some weird midwest Prom beauty aesthetic where big hair and sequined dresses are still considered attractive. Just look at some of the top 15 finishers for this year's Miss USA pageant, these women look like they got caught in a wind tunnel in 1997.
And check out these dresses from 2004, that are ugly in any year.


Dark secret 2) Not all pageants contestants are pretty. Now if you have ever watched the Miss America pageant you already knew this. That pageant is just filled with women who are less than hot. Take, for example, the Miss USA and Miss America winners from 1995:
Miss America is for the sort of woman who wants to become a TV anchor -- her ambition well outstrips her beauty. Plus she posesses a talent for singing or playing the piano or something useless like that. Gorgeous women don't have time to learn how to play the steel drums -- an actual talent this past year. Miss USA on the other hand is the sort of woman who wants to be in Playboy -- she's blonde and willing to take off her clothes, and too lazy to do anything else. Particularly this Miss USA -- Shanna "all I do is sleep" Moakler.

But the real ugliness hides in the state preliminary pageants. A lot of this comes from the fact that you don't need to compete in local pageants to compete in an overall state pageant. In fact, all you need is a misguided belief that you're attractive, a desire for external approval and about $1500. When I would receive applications in the mail at the offices of Sexual Harrassment Inc., girls would send pictures of themselves that were unflattering, and they'd share heights (less than 5'0") and weights (more than 160 lbs) that were clearly NOT shallow pageant material. My boss, who I will call Mr. Sexual Harrassment to protect his anonymity (eventhough I think he may be dead?), would always remark on how these women were fat and had no chance of winning. Yet he had no problem shaking them down for their pageant entry fees. Then he'd tell me I looked like I had lost weight and that if he were 50 years younger I'd be "in trouble."

Dark secret 3) They're called "beauty queens" in a nod to the fact that some of them look like drag queens. Check out Miss Alaska, this gal/dude? looks like Alexis Arquette (the transgendered Arquette...) But beyond the mysterious manliness of Miss Alaska, pageant chicas wear so much make up that they end up looking like the skinny kid sister of Divine (of John Waters fame)-- especially if they aren't that pretty at the outset. Normally make-up increases one's beauty, but in the case of pageant contestants it just serves the eerie purpose of making women of every color and creed look like an interchangeable extra in a Vegas showgirl showcase. Or Alexis Arquette.

3 comments:

Rina said...

bravo!
and here i thought i was the only one who thought that Miss USA pageant contestants were only hot enough to be the hottest chicks at Tommy Joe's.
also, interesting how we both posted about our creepy, chauvinist bosses today

the_mayor said...

I think that not only is the objectification widening, but it's also focusing more on a raunchy porn image. It's topless, it's g-strings and it's in Maxim and rap videos. Why spend 2 hours watching women who keep their clothes on? You could look at a Victoria Secret catalogue if you wanted to see women in revealing clothing. Plus also, as I've already pointed out Miss America isn't even that pretty. I don't think that the ideal of beauty has strayed from what is portrayed in pageants -- they don't dictate the standards they just follow them.

the_mayor said...

Irina actually wrote a blog that was (more or less) about America's take on sexuality and if I knew how to do hyperlinks I'd totally link it here for you. Alas, I'm just a girl and don't speak html.

Though I agree that America's overall opinion of sex as shameful does fuel much of the raunchy porn image, I disagree that it has been pushed to the fringe or is only discussed behind closed doors. The examples I gave in my previous post aren't behind closed doors: MTV is basic cable, Maxim is sold on newsstands everywhere. Further, porn itself has gotten raunchier -- just look at Playboy and how they "went pink." Eew, I just grossed myself out writing that.

In any case, I feel that the objectification of women may not have widened so much as focused on a new genre. Previously women were men's property, and they were domestic goddesses and mothers. Nowadays images of women portray them primarily as sex objects, which is different flavor of objectification than what society was selling before. Sure women in the fifties and sixties were thought of as sex objects, but I think there was a fundamental change when the birth control became legal and widely used. It's like men finally had the epiphany that women enjoyed sex and now they can't focus on anything else about women.
P.S. I don't konw anything about this Stacy lady, but I will say that I am not a fan of Vida Guerra. Also, I saw a picture of Anna Kournikova today and at first glance I thought she was Natalee Holloway.
P.P.S. Is that Miss America thing a reference to the fact that the miss America featured in this posting is disabled??